<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Shows Big Decline in Unique Visitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jgsullivan.com/2009/11/20/twitter-shows-big-decline-in-unique-visitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jgsullivan.com/2009/11/20/twitter-shows-big-decline-in-unique-visitors/</link>
	<description>JGSullivan Interactive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.jgsullivan.com/2009/11/20/twitter-shows-big-decline-in-unique-visitors/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jgsullivan.com/?p=1277#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Twitter&#039;s problem is that it a glorified RSS service. When I say that, I mean readers will quickly learn (after signing up) that there&#039;s not much to the service except getting new stories in bits --- just like the old RSS feeds from years ago.

My point is this, Twitter is this year&#039;s Second Life. By this time next year, Twitter will have become even less relevant. There&#039;s no way to monetize the service and growth potential is bottlenecked by it&#039;s extremely limited scope of design.

And, with the economy being so bad right now, I can&#039;t imagine many companies want to invest a lot into unknow, unproven advertising directions. Besides, from the companies I&#039;ve seen who are interested in Twitter, they just have a person on staff setup an account and post updates internally. There&#039;s no real way to make Twitter a valuable asset to &quot;sell&quot; to clients since it&#039;s so painfully simple and limited ANY employee at ANY company can figure it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter&#8217;s problem is that it a glorified RSS service. When I say that, I mean readers will quickly learn (after signing up) that there&#8217;s not much to the service except getting new stories in bits &#8212; just like the old RSS feeds from years ago.</p>
<p>My point is this, Twitter is this year&#8217;s Second Life. By this time next year, Twitter will have become even less relevant. There&#8217;s no way to monetize the service and growth potential is bottlenecked by it&#8217;s extremely limited scope of design.</p>
<p>And, with the economy being so bad right now, I can&#8217;t imagine many companies want to invest a lot into unknow, unproven advertising directions. Besides, from the companies I&#8217;ve seen who are interested in Twitter, they just have a person on staff setup an account and post updates internally. There&#8217;s no real way to make Twitter a valuable asset to &#8220;sell&#8221; to clients since it&#8217;s so painfully simple and limited ANY employee at ANY company can figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

